Saturday 5 October 2013

Saudi hitam Pasukan Op belakang Damsyik Serangan senjata kimia - Sumber Diplomatik . . .



SitiWanMahani - Radikal Arab yang disokong di belakang Damsyik Serangan Kimia - Sumber Rusia. Ogos kimia serangan senjata di pinggir bandar ibu negara Syria ini telah dilakukan oleh pasukan Arab Operasi hitam Saudi, sumber diplomatik Rusia telah memberitahu agensi berita Rusia.

Saudi-backed Radicals behind Damascus Chemical Attack - 
Russian sources . . .

The August chemical weapons attack in the Syrian capital's suburbs was done by a Saudi Arabian black operations team, Russian diplomatic sources have told a Russian news agency.

Seorang lelaki, yang terjejas oleh apa yang aktivis katakan adalah gas saraf, bernafas melalui topeng oksigen di pinggir bandar Damsyik 21 Ogos 2013 (A man, affected by what activists say is nerve gas, breathes through an oxygen mask in the Damascus suburbs August 21, 2013 (Reuters/Ammar Dar  - think IN pictures @1WORLDCommunity)

SitiWanMahani - Saudi hitam pasukan op belakang Damsyik serangan senjata kimia - sumber diplomatik. Serangan senjata kimia Ogos di pinggir bandar ibu negara Syria ini telah dilakukan oleh pasukan Arab operasi hitam Saudi, sumber diplomatik Rusia telah memberitahu agensi berita Rusia.

“Berdasarkan data daripada beberapa sumber bergambar boleh menyambung bersama-sama. Provokasi jenayah di Timur Ghouta telah dilakukan oleh pasukan kendalian hitam Saudi yang dihantar melalui Jordan dan yang bertindak dengan sokongan daripada kumpulan Liwa Al ‘Islam,” kata seorang sumber di kalangan diplomatik kepada Interfax.

Serangan dan akibatnya mempunyai kesan yang besar kepada keadaan Syria, sumber lain berkata.

“Syria pelbagai pandangan politik, termasuk beberapa pejuang pembangkang, yang ingin memaklumkan diplomat dan ahli-ahli pertubuhan-pertubuhan antarabangsa yang bekerja di Syria apa yang mereka tahu tentang jenayah dan kuasa-kuasa yang diilhamkan itu,” katanya kepada agensi.

Liwa Al ‘Islam adalah kumpulan bersenjata Islam operasi berhampiran Damsyik diketuai oleh anak seorang ulama Salafi berasaskan Saudi. Kumpulan itu mendakwa bertanggungjawab bagi pengeboman mesyuarat kerajaan rahsia di Damsyik pada bulan Julai 2012 yang mengorbankan beberapa pegawai Syria atas, termasuk Menteri Pertahanan Dawoud Rajiha, timbalannya Asef Shawkat, dan Penolong Naib Presiden Hassan Turkmani.

Dakwaan-dakwaan yang bercermin beberapa laporan sebelum ini, yang menunjuk kepada Arab Saudi sebagai dalang di sebalik serangan gas sarin, yang hampir membawa kepada tindakan ketenteraan Amerika Syarikat terhadap kerajaan Syria. Penyokong senario ini berkata perkhidmatan perisikan di Riyadh diperlukan operasi bendera palsu untuk memprovokasi serangan Amerika di Syria, yang akan hujung kira-kira yang memihak kepada pembangkang bersenjata disokong oleh Arab Saudi.

Walaupun majoriti negara-negara Barat berkata, mereka yakin bahawa kerajaan Syria membawa menyalahkan serangan, Damsyik menegaskan bahawa pasukan pemberontak mesti di belakangnya. Rusia berkongsi keyakinan ini juga, memanggil insiden provokasi.

Kembali pada bulan Mac Presiden Amerika Syarikat, Barack Obama berkata penggunaan senjata kimia akan menjadi ‘Garis merah’ untuk kerajaan Syria, melintasinya yang akan meminta campur tangan Amerika ke dalam konflik Syria berdarah. Selepas serangan Ogos, yang percaya Amerika Syarikat telah mendakwa kira-kira 1,400 nyawa, presiden dipanggil kata-kata beliau dengan ramai penyokong pembangkang Syria kedua-dua di negara dan di luar Amerika Syarikat.

Pelan bagi tindakan ketenteraan diletakkan pada berhenti selepas perjanjian Rusia- ditaja dengan Damsyik, yang bersetuju untuk menyertai Pertubuhan bagi Larangan Senjata Kimia (OPCW) dan memusnahkan simpanan daripada senjata kimia. Pakar-pakar dari OPCW kini di Syria bersedia untuk pelucutan senjata.

Kembali pada bulan Mac, Presiden Amerika Syarikat, Barack Obama berkata penggunaan senjata kimia akan menjadi ‘Garis merah’ untuk kerajaan Syria, melintasinya yang akan meminta campur tangan Amerika dalam konflik Syria berdarah. Selepas serangan Ogos, yang percaya Amerika Syarikat telah mendakwa kira-kira 1,400 nyawa, presiden telah dipanggil untuk bertindak ke atas kata-kata beliau oleh ramai penyokong pembangkang Syria kedua-dua di negara dan di luar Amerika Syarikat.

Terdahulu laporan PBB menyimpulkan bahawa gas saraf itu memang telah digunakan “secara besar-besaran” pada bulan Ogos. Walau bagaimanapun, konsisten penemuan ini adalah di bawahO soalan.

Menurut laporan itu, tiada seorang pun sampel alam sekitar PBB dikumpulkan di Barat Ghouta diuji positif Sarin, manakala sampel bioperubatan , yang diambil dari orang-orang terjejas, semua diuji positif.

RT’s Worlds Apart host Oksana Boyko telah bercakap dengan Angela Kane, wakil PBB tinggi untuk pelucutan senjata hal ehwal, yang baru sahaja pulang dari Damsyik.

“Jika anda membaca laporan itu, laporan itu keluar dan berkata sarin digunakan. Ia juga merupakan perkara yang mungkin dalam sampel alam sekitar mereka mengambil tiada sarin ditemui, tetapi itu tidak bermakna bahawa sarin tidak digunakan,” Kane kepada alam Apart. “Ia ada dalam sampel manusia. Jika mereka mempunyai lebih banyak masa untuk pergi di sekitar mereka akan dapati sampel yang berbeza. Ia adalah koleksi terhad yang mereka lakukan, tetapi koleksi ini adalah muktamad. Saya fikir, ia adalah sangat komprehensif, oleh itu, kami berkongsi semua orang-orang sampel dengan kerajaan Syria.”

Pada masa yang sama, terdapat kebimbangan yang disuarakan saksi pasukan PBB bercakap dengan dibawa oleh pembangkang dari kawasan-kawasan yang berbeza dan tidak hidup di Barat Ghouta.

“Saya rasa ia tidak mungkin untuk mengatakan ‘Kami membawa mereka semua dari kawasan yang berbeza.’ Dari fikiran saya bahawa adalah mustahil. Anda boleh datang dengan teori, tetapi ini tidak bermakna teori adalah betul,” kata Kane.



SitiWanMahani - Kredibiliti laporan PBB mengenai serangan kimia Ghouta dipersoalkan sebagai paradoks sampel diturunkan. Pakar-pakar dari pemerhati senjata kimia di DUNIA mengatakan mereka membuat kemajuan yang menggalakkan ke arah merungkai stok simpanan Syria.

Satu pasukan daripada Pertubuhan bagi Larangan Senjata Kimia adalah di Damsyik untuk mengadakan perbincangan dengan pegawai-pegawai. Satu laporan PBB sebelum membuat kesimpulan bahawa Gas Saraf itu memang telah digunakan secara besar-besaran pada bulan Ogos tetapi konsisten penemuan adalah di bawah soalan, sebagai Oksana Boyko menjelaskan kepada saya sebelum ini.

Credibility of UN report on Ghouta chem attack questioned 
as sample paradoxes revealed . . .

Experts from the world's chemical weapons watchdog say they're making encouraging progress towards dismantling Syria's stockpiles.

A team from the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons is in Damascus for talks with officials. A UN report earlier concluded that nerve gas had indeed been used on a large scale in August but the consistency of the findings are under question, as Oksana Boyko explained to me earlier.

RT LIVE http://rt.com/on-air

Saudi black op team behind Damascus chem weapons attack – Diplomatic Sources . . .

The August chemical weapons attack in the Syrian capital’s suburbs was done by a Saudi Arabian black operations team, Russian diplomatic sources have told a Russian news agency.

“Based on data from a number of sources a picture can be pieced together. The criminal provocation in Eastern Ghouta was done by a black op team that the Saudi’s sent through Jordan and which acted with support of the Liwa Al-Islam group,” a source in the diplomatic circles told Interfax.

The attack and its consequences had a huge impact on the Syrian situation, another source said.

“Syrians of various political views, including some opposition fighters, are seeking to inform diplomats and members of international organizations working in Syria what they know about the crime and the forces which inspired it,” he told the agency.

Liwa Al-Islam is an Islamist armed group operating near Damascus headed by the son of a Saudi-based Salafi cleric. The group claimed responsibility for the bombing of a secret governmental meeting in Damascus in July 2012 that killed a number of top Syrian officials, including Defense Minister Dawoud Rajiha, his deputy Asef Shawkat, and Assistant Vice President Hassan Turkmani.

The allegations mirror a number of earlier reports, which pointed to Saudi Arabia as the mastermind behind the sarin gas attack, which almost led to US military action against Syrian government. Proponents of this scenario say intelligence services in Riyadh needed a false flag operation to provoke an American attack in Syria, which would tip the balance in favor of the armed opposition supported by Saudi Arabia.

While the majority of Western countries say they are certain that the Syrian government carries the blame for the attack, Damascus maintains that the rebel forces must be behind it. Russia shares this conviction too, calling the incident a provocation.

Back in March US President Barack Obama said the use of chemical weapons would be a ‘red line’ for the Syrian government, crossing which would prompt America’s intervention into the bloody Syrian conflict. After the August attack, which the US believes has claimed some 1,400 lives, the president was called on his words by many supporters of the Syrian opposition both at home and outside of the US.

The plan for military action was put on pause after a Russia-brokered deal with Damascus, which agreed to join the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) and destroy its stockpile of chemical weapons. Experts from OPCW are currently in Syria preparing for the disarmament.

Back in March, US President Barack Obama said the use of chemical weapons would be a ‘red line’ for the Syrian government, crossing which would prompt America’s intervention in the bloody Syrian conflict. After the August attack, which the US believes has claimed some 1,400 lives, the president was called to act on his words by many supporters of the Syrian opposition both at home and outside the US.

Earlier a UN report concluded that nerve gas had indeed been used “on a large scale” in August. However, the consistency of the findings is under question.

According to the report, none of the environmental samples the UN collected in Western Ghouta tested positive for Sarin, while biomedical samples, taken from affected people, all tested positive.

RT’s Worlds Apart host Oksana Boyko has spoken to Angela Kane, UN high representative for disarmament affairs, who has just returned from Damascus.

“If you read the report, the report comes out and says sarin was used. It is also a matter that maybe in the environmental samples they took there was no sarin found, but that does not mean that sarin was not used,” Kane told Worlds Apart. “It was there in the human samples. If they had more time to go around they would have found different samples. It was a limited collection that they did, but the collection was conclusive. I think, it was very comprehensive, therefore, we shared all of those samples with the Syrian government.”

At the same time, there have been concerns voiced that witnesses the UN team spoke to were brought by the opposition from different regions and did not live in Western Ghouta.

“I think it is not possible to say ‘We brought them all from a different area.’ To my mind that is inconceivable. You can come up with the theory, but this does not mean the theory is correct,” Kane said.


Kenderaan Bangsa Bersatu sebagai dilihat meninggalkan hotel di Damsyik  (United Nations vehicles are seen leaving the hotel in Damascus (AFP Photo/Louai Beshara  - think IN pictures @1WORLDCommunity)

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...